It is that time, once again, to exercise that most
sacred of American freedoms, namely the right to vote on those people
who are supposed to be working for our best interests. However, with
our current political system, and especially the existence of the
Electoral College, many people may feel that their vote doesn't
really count. For the sake of completeness, and to help everyone be
on the same page, I am going to cover some of the Electoral College's
history, and what it is supposed to do. Most high-school American
History books do not really cover this information, and are,
generally, books of Great American Mythology more than actual history
and just briefly touch on the mechanics of Government. There are a
multitude of subjects I could cover from this sentence, alone, but
this is about the Electoral College, so that is what I shall write
about.
Once the Revolutionary War was won, and the Founders
got down to the serious work of creating a government, and choosing
the very first leader of the United States, there was a quandary.
You have to remember that America, originally, was made up of
thirteen states, all very suspicious of a central government, and had
a very small population spread along the Eastern Seaboard. It was
also believed that political parties were mischievous, if not down
right evil, and that a proper gentlemen does not actively seek out
office. Instead the office was suppose to seek out the proper person
for the job, and court them, instead of the candidate courting the
electorate that happens today. So how to choose somebody for the
most difficult job in the country, without a nation-wide
communication network aside from the early post office and
newspapers, and without having the candidates campaign. Never mind
keeping from upsetting the careful balance of power between the
president and congress.
There were several ideas for how the president could be
chosen. The very first was to have congress choose the president,
but it was thought that choosing the president could become a very
divisive issue that could have the members of congress resentful of
one another. You have to remember, the idea of political parties was
considered at best very bad, and at worst evil incarnate, so the
Founders were interested in preserving the peace and keep
divisiveness to a minimum. A second idea was to have state
legislatures choose, but it was felt that this would allow the states
to erode federal authority and undermine the very idea of a
federation. Third was the popular vote, but at the time, the
populations of the various states could not get information from
beyond their states' borders. You have to remember, at the time,
interstate travel was troublesome at least, and practically
impossible at most. So there was a legitimate worry about a
candidate from a more populous state winning a popular vote, or the
populations of the various states voting for their local candidate
over somebody from elsewhere. Again, this was before national
campaigns, and having the candidates wooing the electorate instead of
vice-versa. There was also a lack of communication networks, and a
lack of political parties, they being thought to be reprehensible.
Also, at the time, the Framers of the Constitution believed that
there could be as many as five different candidates from various
regions of the country. Lastly, of course, there was a real fear
that slave-holding states would have an unfair advantage in the area
of politics, especially with population-based programs.
Mind you, there was a clique among the Founders that
thought that such an important political decision should not be left
in the hands of the people. Alexander Hamilton was one of the
primary members of a group known as the Federalists, and neither he
nor his cronies could be called “men of the people”. They had
great disdain for the masses, Hamilton being quoted as calling them a
“great beast”. They felt that government should be dominated by
the banking and merchant classes, they being better educated than the
farmers and laborers that made up the rest of the population. It
could be said that today's money-dominated political landscape had
its roots in Hamilton's elitist attitude, but I digress. Those who
opposed the Federalists, including Thomas Jefferson, felt that they
were creating a form of elected monarchy, with the rich and powerful
getting preferred treatment over the common people. Sound familiar?
Sorry, I digress, yet again. However, this rivalry was the precursor
to the very first political parties in the United States. I have to
include yet another digression to say that the political party system
has turned out to be as toxic as those early Americans believed.
They have led to blind loyalty, and blind obedience to the party line
on the part of their members.
The Electoral College has not changed, very much, from
its original incarnation. There were some minor changes to
accommodate the reality of political parties, true, but it is mostly
unchanged. Nowadays it seems like the Electoral College votes for
the president and the vice-president, instead of the runner up in the
presidential election becoming the vice-president. Still, it started
out with each state choosing electors equal to its total
representation in Congress, House and Senate seats combined. The
electors would meet in their states and cast two votes for president.
The winner would be the person with the majority of the votes. The
Founders thought that no one, aside from George Washington, would be
able to win with a clear majority. With the absence of a clear
majority, the election would be decided by the House of
Representatives, where each state represented would have a single
vote. The runner up, originally would have become the
vice-president. That changed, and the electors would cast one vote
for the president, and one for the vice-president.
Now there have only been four times where the Electoral
College voted for a different candidate than the popular vote. The
first three took place in the early days of the country, and the
latest became something of a joke due to the hanging chad dilemma.
However, America's collective memory is quite long and people, while
maybe not knowing what it does, remembers that the Electoral College
does not have to vote with the popular vote. This makes a lot of
people feel that their vote does not, really, matter; especially if
their candidate lost the race. Also for about forty years, since the
first opinion polls were instituted, the American people have wanted
the presidency to be decided by popular vote. People, especially the
people of America, hate not having their voices heard, and the
Electoral College is seen as a way of stifling the will of the
people. Again, this is especially true if their candidate was the
loser, and our lovely political parties are SUCH good losers. Not.
Now, it is possible that once the people of America have a direct
hand in the choice of President, the people of America would start to
actually educate themselves about each candidate's policies, records
and platforms instead of merely following the party line. It's not a
large hope, given the current “us verses them” political
atmosphere, but one can hope.